The Innkeepers

The Innkeepers

starring Sara Paxton, Pat Healy, and Kelly McGillis

Written and directed by Ti West

2011

101 minutes

Rated R

Here is another "haunted hotel" movie for you fans of The Shining. There are a few elements that seem similar to the Stephen King story: empty hotel (it is closing after one last weekend), few main characters, and of course, ghosts covered in blood, but there are plenty of differences to make this an entertainingly spooky ghost story in its own right.

This movie takes place at a real inn in Torrington, Connecticut called the Yankee Pedlar Inn. It was built by Frank and Alice Conley and opened in 1891. There are 55 individual rooms and 5 suites. The inn boasts period furnishings and a tavern. Here is a link to their History page.

The Yankee Pedlar Inn Today

Alice and Frank Conley

Because the Inn is old, many people believe or assume that paranormal activity has occurred there. The most "haunted" room is Room 353 where Alice Conley died, and Alice supposedly still roams the halls, checking on guests. She sounds like a nice comforting ghost, one that the hotel guests wouldn't mind seeing, doesn't she? Despite investigations by the Northwest Connecticut Paranormal Society, however, there have been no confirmed manifestations of Alice, Frank, or anyone else at the Yankee Pedlar.

But just because there have been no positive sightings doesn't mean that the Yankee Pedlar Inn can't make a good backdrop for a paranormal horror movie.

Our story takes place at the Yankee Pedlar Inn, a once-grand hotel that is about to close (this part is fictional and the Inn is still open today). We meet the two remaining employees, Luke (Pat Healy) and Claire (Sara Paxton). There are few guests this weekend, a mother and son who leave during the beginning part of the movie; Leanne Rease-Jones (Kellie McGillis), a movie star turned new age counselor who is attending a convention; and an older man who wants to stay in the room in which he spent his honeymoon.

Madeline O'Malley

Luke dabbles in ghost hunting and runs a website about the Inn's supposed hauntings. He has been conducting investigations on his own and has equipment to record EVPs, but he hasn't really found much. Claire, who has just left college, has become Luke's ghost-hunting acolyte. She is fascinated with Luke's stories, especially the one about Madeline O'Malley, the bride who hanged herself after her fiance abandoned her on her wedding day. Madeline is said to be buried in the basement of the Yankee Pedlar, hidden there by the owners who didn't want the bad publicity her death would bring, I suppose. Claire really is impressed with Luke's website and wants to help him with the research.

Claire's naive intrigue with the ghost hunting process is the best part of the movie, and Sara Paxton's character and acting is the most convincing to me. Claire uses Luke's equipment to try EVP sessions around the hotel, searching for any response from Madeline O'Malley. Tension builds as Claire hears music coming from the unattended piano, sees Madeline's bloody face around the hotel, and other disembodied voices speak to her in the basement. Luke cannot handle this activity and freaks out, confessing that he has never actually experienced any paranormal occurrences at the Inn before, and leaves Claire in the hotel to deal with the situation herself.

By the end of the movie, though, I was not sure how much of the paranormal activity was really happening or if it were actually only in Claire's impressionable and receptive mind. Although we see all of the characters in action, I think this story takes place through Claire's point of view and we "see" what Claire sees without looking through her eyes via the camera. I don't think Luke really sees or hears anything in the basement but only reacts to Claire's seeing and hearing--"She's right behind you!" Leanne tries to help Claire with her crystal pendulum but urges Claire to leave the hotel because it isn't safe for her, but Leanne doesn't specify the source of the danger. Nobody else sees the ghosts of Madeline or the old man, who has committed suicide in his former honeymoon suite and is discovered by Claire in all of the bloody horror.

With Luke's interview by the police at the end come more doubts about the hauntings. Luke has come back after Claire discovered the old man's death. He agrees to find Leanne to tell her to leave the hotel with them, but Claire, left alone, hears noises in the basement. Thinking it might be Leanne, Claire goes down the stairs to check it out (we are all shouting, NO! DON'T GO DOWN THERE! at this point). She falls, hits her head, and starts seeing the ghosts everywhere. She locks herself in a room at the end of the basement hallway and cannot escape. The ghosts bang on the door, over and over. Already having established previously that Claire is asthmatic, we know what is going to happen and it does. But after the fact, Luke tells the police that it is he banging on the door and calling Claire to let him in. Where were the ghosts? Did he not see them?!

This movie is appealing for many reasons. I like the location of the empty, shabby chic hotel. The minimal cast also brings strength to the tightness of the story--not too many characters to confuse things. The ghost hunting by amateurs is also very believable to me and appealing, and yes, it can be dangerous. The bloodiest scene, the discovery of the old gentleman in the bathroom, is gory but we don't see it happen to him. The tension is built slowly with small noises, shadows, glimpses out of the corner of our eye. Then we feel all of the terror that Claire is feeling, from the panic of being left by Luke to finding the dead body and finally, the hysterical panicked run through the labyrinthine basement.

This movie is Rated R for bloody images and language. Here is the trailer for you. Don't get too scared!

The Awakening

The Awakening
starring Rebecca Hall, Dominic West, 
and Imelda Staunton
2011
107 minutes
Rated R

This weekend was a good movie-watching one for me. Besides The Picture of Dorian Gray, a classic movie based on a classic book, I watched a "haunted house" film, my favorite type of horror movie. This one, called The Awakening, was filmed at Lyme Park, a beautiful yet eerie National Trust house in the Peak District in England. There are very few satisfying haunted house movies, especially recently, and the English seem to do it so much better than anyone else. This movie is no exception. It may have its flaws, but I found it quite satisfying and suitably spine-tingling.

The time is 1921. England is still recovering from the massive loss of life in World War I, and everywhere people are searching for comfort from spiritualists. Rebecca Hall plays Florence Cathcart, a ghost hunter who specializes in exposing phony mediums. She has written a book on the subject and is known for her expertise and intelligence.

Directly after a successful and exhausting hunt, Florence is visited by Robert Mallory (Dominic West), a teacher at a boys' boarding school where a child ghost has been seen by many of the boys. The ghost has appeared in the class photographs over the years, and the headmistress of the school (Imelda Staunton), a devotee of Cathcart's book, would like her to come and investigate.The catalyst of the request, however, is a recent death of student and the other boys are convinced that the ghost had something to do with it. Despite Florence's exhaustion from her last hunt, she is intrigued by the case and agrees to go with Mallory to the boarding house.

Once at the boarding house, we learn that it used to be a private home and a young boy had died there. Using the latest ghost-hunting apparatus, Florence quickly discovers the non-ghostly cause of the student's death. The case is closed and she packs up and prepares to leave. The school is shut down for half-term and all of the boys depart, all but one. 

Strange things begin to happen directly to Florence. She sees someone in the lake and falls in. She sees scary little dolls in a dollhouse version of the boarding school that look like people in the school, set in scenes from her activities.She sees a boy where none should be, and flashes of other people appear. Things like this aren't supposed to be happening to a realist like Florence. Add a budding romance between Florence and Robert Mallory, a rather odd headmistress, and a psychotic groundskeeper and you have the makings of a really satisfying old-fashioned ghost story.

Here is a trailer for the movie. The R rating is for scariness, nudity and sexual content.

After watching movie, I was interested to learn more about the location of the boarding school. Lyme Park is a National Trust home and you can visit. Here is a website to learn more. Fans of Jane Austen movies will recognize it as Pemberly, the estate of Mr. Darcy in Pride and Prejudice (1995, Colin Firth and Jennifer Ehle).

Lyme Park, Disley, Cheshire, England

Since I am also interested in art, I was interested to see another spooky painting in this movie. "It came with the building, it's the boys' favorite." Mallory thinks it is a painting of the beheading of John the Baptist, but erudite Florence corrects him and identifies it as Judith Slaying Holofernes, taken from the biblical story of Judith in which she kills the Assyrian general after he has fallen asleep drunk, thus delivering the Kingdom of Israel. Many painters have dealt with this bloodthirsty topic, including Titian, Rembrandt, Caravaggio, Donatello, and others but the painting shown in the movie is by the Italian early Baroque artist Artemisia Gentileschi (1611-12) and is especially gory with blood. It doesn't refer to any other part of the movie's story but is just another interesting fact, perhaps to illustrate Florence's intelligence.

You might also be interested in listening to the entire hymn,  Be Still My Soul, which is sung in the movie and uses the beautiful theme from Finlandia by Finnish composer, Jean Sibelius.

The Picture of Dorian Gray

The Picture of Dorian Gray, Ivan Albright, 1945
The Art Institute of Chicago

This past week I went to one of my favorite places, the Art Institute in Chicago, and saw this painting by Ivan Albright, The Picture of Dorian Gray (1945). It was painted for the movie based on Oscar Wilde's only novel with the same title, directed by Albert Lewin and starring George Sanders, Hurd Hatfield, Donna Reed, and Angela Lansbury. On its own, this painting portrays an unreal and disturbing monster of a person, his clothes are slashed, stained, and decayed. The colors of the painting are strangely muted, not as bright as one might think blood and gore should be, but they are also more organic looking as a result. And this is a painting that developed organically.

In the movie, filmed in black and white, there are a few moments of color. The first comes when we get to see the painting of Dorian that his friend, Basil Hallward, had just completed. It shows a young gentleman who is self-assured, talented, wealthy, upper-class, and flawless.

Portrait of Dorian Gray, painted by Henrique Medina
 for the movie The Picture of Dorian Gray (1945)

In the story, Dorian Gray meets and befriends another friend of Basil's, Lord Henry Wotton, whose world view is based on hedonism and the fulfillment of the senses. All experiences are worth having, good and bad, without considering  the consequences to others. I am not quite sure how this works into his other opinion that seeking Youth and Beauty are of the highest value in life, since I do not associate bad or evil experiences as a way  to finding Youth or Beauty. Dorian likes his portrait and wishes that he could always be young and beautiful while his portrait would change. Lucky for him (or unfortunate for him, as the case may be), there just happens to be a little statue of Bastet, the Egyptian cat-goddess nearby. She appears in the portrait to Dorian's right. Perhaps we are meant to think that Bastet is sympathetic to the search for Youth and Beauty and wishes to give Dorian what he wants, or perhaps she might feel that he is foolish to wish for something like this and wants to teach him a lesson.

Dorian's infatuation with Sibyl Vane is a good example of his incorporating Lord Henry's philosophy into his own life. His infatuation with Sibyl and then his rejection of her at the advice of Lord Henry, in the guise of a test, shows that Dorian doesn't comprehend, although he might still care at this point, what he represented to Sibyl. She is desperate for a way to leave her life of singing in the little club, and her mother seems to constantly tell her that she deserves better. When "better" finds her and Dorian offers her a way out, she snatches it eagerly despite the inequality of their situations. But Sibyl is not willing to go against her moral standards to be with Basil and certainly does not expect to be rejected so utterly.

The next shocking flash of color comes when we again see the portrait. Absorbing all of the vices of the model, the painting has become gross, decayed, and terrifying. We haven't seen Dorian commit many crimes during the story and movie; we only know that 18 years have passed since Sibyl's death. We can only imagine the atrocities he has committed over the years. Of course, the horror of his murdering his friend Basil on top of the seduction of young innocent Gladys Hallward, who naively things that just because Dorian is so good looking, the things people say about him can't be true, are only a small sample of Dorian's vices. But the ending of the story proves that there can be redemption after all but at what price? This painting has come to represent his soul, what he has become deep inside and hides from the world. Can anyone this ugly and horrifying inside be capable of caring for anyone but himself? Will Gladys end up like poor Sibyl?

I thought Hurd Hatfield was a good choice for Dorian. I was particularly struck by how mask-like his face is throughout the movie, so smooth and wrinkle-free. But to have a face like this, it would imply that this person also doesn't show any emotion. Smiles cause wrinkles, too, and Hurd as Dorian doesn't ever seem to smile or laugh. Does he enjoy his life? Perhaps he is not capable of it.

If you haven't seen this movie, I recommend it but not as a substitute for the novel by Oscar Wilde. That is a classic of literary horror and shouldn't be missed.

The Albright painting was painted with the Medina portrait as the base. I wish the Art Institute had both of them side by side to show the contrast. Without the other, Albright's painting is a ghoulish painting that exemplifies a life spent in evil pursuits, or maybe it is just another zombie picture. Nasty but interesting. We don't understand the message of the book without the "original" to compare to it.

Rebecca

"Last night I dreamt I was at Manderley again...."

Rebecca
by Daphne Du Maurier
first published in 1938

Rebecca
directed by Alfred Hitchcock
starring Joan Fontaine, Laurence Olivier George Sanders, and Judith Anderson
1940

Rebecca by Daphne Du Maurier is the only book I had to read again directly after finishing it for the first time because the "book withdrawal" was too painful. I could not stand the idea that I was finished with the story, that I was unable to spend more time with the characters of Maxim and the unnamed Mrs. de Winter and find out what happens next with them. I knew what happened to them, since that is explained somewhat in the beginning of the story, but I was having a hard time getting my brain from the dramatic burning of Manderley to the de Winters' life in exile. I guess Maxim and Mrs. de Winter must have had the same problem, since they couldn't bear the thought of even going back to England to live somewhere else. You would think, though, that Mrs. de Winter would be rather happy that the house haunted by the past was destroyed and they could finally be free from Rebecca.

And Manderley is definitely haunted. Everywhere we look there are signs of the title character, Rebecca, the first Mrs. de Winter. We don't have to meet her or see her ghost, she is there everywhere for us to run into unexpectedly. Her name is on the stationery in the morning room, her monogram is on the table linen, her name is invoked by the servants, and even the dog misses her. Who could match up to somebody who was so talented, beautiful, involved, and organized? Certainly not the new Mrs. de Winter, who is a little mouse of a girl, much younger than her new husband and totally unused to life in a large house as a society wife.

This is a story about bad marriages. We eventually come to find out just how bad the marriage is between Max and Rebecca, despite appearances, but what about the marriage of Maxim and his new much younger wife? It doesn't have the best of beginnings, with a casual proposal and a joke about white frocks and conservatories. Our narrator thinks so little of herself that she doesn't expect a more affectionate proposal; this one was a complete surprise, and I think it means much more to our narrator than to Maxim. I also think Maxim's disregard of his new wife's feelings and experience shows that he has not embarked on a better, more equal marriage. She hesitatingly tries to tell him about her fears and inadequacies, but he pushes them aside without really listening. Mrs. de Winter asks him several times throughout the story if they are really happy together, that their marriage is a success. I think if she has to ask, it probably isn't.

But our biggest sign that this new marriage is not a "marriage of true minds" is that Maxim never once tells his new wife about his real feelings for Rebecca. Mrs. de Winter would not ask him herself, she is too insecure and has had heard from Mrs. Van Hopper about how devoted Max was to Rebecca. He didn't have to confess to her death, but he could have and should have told his new wife that their relationship was not paradise on earth. I know he wants to forget Rebecca and the disaster of their marriage and her death, but how could he not prepare his new wife for what she would face at Manderley? What total insensitivity! And it would have saved a lot of trouble later. But then what would happen to the story? Where would it be without that conflict and uncertainty?! Okay, I admit it, without Maxim being an insensitive man, the story wouldn't be nearly as interesting.

Recently I showed the Alfred Hitchcock version of Rebecca (1940) during my public library Classic Movie series. This movie won an Academy Award as Best Picture (Hitchock's only Best Picture win), and rocketed Daphne du Maurier's book to its place as one of the best gothic horror stories of all time. How does it compare to the book? Well, for me it has good points and bad points.

Laurence Olivier and
Joan Fontaine

The main stars of this movie are Laurence Olivier and Joan Fontaine, with Judith Anderson and George Sanders. I think Laurence Olivier is superb as the suave, sophisticated, wealthy, broody Max de Winter. Joan Fontaine, however, does not match my mental image of the new Mrs. de Winter. First of all, she is much too pretty, I think. The age difference between these two actors is or seems minimal, whereas the book characters are definitely about twenty years apart. Also, Joan Fontaine does not come across as a gauche girl/woman who doesn't know much about the herself, let alone society.

The true star of the book and the movie is Mrs. Danvers, played in the movie by Judith Anderson. Mrs. Danvers is the epitome of the creepy housekeeper. She may be good at her job and seems to run Manderley quite well, but she is the main reason that Rebecca is allowed to haunt the house. She enshrines Rebecca in the West Wing, keeping everything just as it was on Rebecca's last night. She constantly refers to Rebecca and the way she wanted things done. Strong people like Maxim might think that Mrs. Danvers' obsession with Rebecca is normal since she was with her from the time Rebecca was a girl. As long as the house runs smoothly! But how could a new wife unaccustomed to running a household or servants deal with this obsession? Obviously, Mrs. de Winter can't. She is absolutely terrorized by Mrs. Danvers, not only by her inexperience, but Mrs. Danvers' subtle campaign against her.

What could Mrs. Danvers (Judith Anderson) be whispering
 to Mrs. De Winter (Joan Fontaine)

I think that Rebecca's true character is subdued in the Alfred Hitchcock movie--in the book, she is much worse. She is like the rose in William Blake's poem:

O Rose thou art sick.

The invisible worm,

That flies in the night

In the howling storm:

Has found out thy bed

Of crimson joy:

And his dark secret love

Does thy life destroy.

But the worm inside her not only destroyed her life, it very nearly destroyed everyone around her.

If you enjoy stories about the complexities of relationships, as well as how people can affect each other even after death, you will find this story intriguing. Add to that the scary big house, the crazy housekeeper, the mystery of Rebecca's death, and the haunting and you have all the makings of a very satisfying ghost story.

Julie Harris and The Haunting of Hill House

One of my favorite movie scenes.
Claire Bloom and Julie Harris

The actress Julie Harris died yesterday at age 87.

I will always remember her best for her performance as Eleanor Vance, in one of my favorite stories, The Haunting of Hill House by Shirley Jackson. The book was written in 1959 and has become the most famous haunted house story of the 20th Century. No blog about scary books would be complete without discussing it!

The first movie adaption of this book came out in 1963. Julie Harris played the main character, Eleanor Vance, who comes to Hill House for a vacation. Yes, that's correct. A vacation, a holiday from home. You might be thinking, Is this lady nuts?! Well, actually, maybe.

Eleanor is told in her letter from Dr. Markway about the house and the experiment, but I don't think Eleanor gets it at first. She just sees this as a chance to get away--away from her past life of caring for her mother who is now dead, away from her unreasonable sister who has filled in their mother's shoes as another person who imprisons Eleanor in a life of drudgery. Eleanor is so reclusive and shy that I have often wondered how she dared break free, even with the promise of somewhere to go. The movie doesn't include the book's description of Eleanor's visit to the small coffeehouse in the depressing town near Hill House. I think this experience shows that Eleanor is more determined to get away than we might expect because I would probably have wanted to run back home myself after being stared at by those odd villagers.

At Hill House, Eleanor meets some interesting personalities. Dr. John Markway, the scientific parapsychologist, seems friendly and organized, if not a little naive about what a truly haunted house will do to sensitive people like Eleanor. Theo seems to be everything that Eleanor would like to be: sophisticated, independent, beautiful, talented, self-assured. Luke Sanderson is the heir to Hill House and is quite mercenary about the whole visit. And who can forget the Dudleys, especially the efficient and charming Mrs. Dudley:

Rosalie Crutchley as the creepy Mrs. Dudley

"I set dinner on the dining room sideboard at 6. I clear up in the morning. I have breakfast for you at 9. I don't wait on people. I don't stay after I set out the dinner, not after it begins to get dark. I leave before the dark....We live over in town, miles away.... So there won't be anyone around if you need help....We couldn't hear you. In the night.... No one could.... No one lives any nearer than town. No one will come any nearer than that.... In the night. In the dark."

Well, we have only arrived and we're not scared yet, right?

Quite soon we get into the haunting and everything you could want in a good haunting happens: spooky noises, walls that move, disembodied voices, phantom animals, mysterious writing on the wall, magically appearing blood stains, noxious smells. Add to that the extremely creepy past history lesson that Dr. Markway gives to his new students and it is no wonder this story scares most people. We do have some lighter moments, with Mrs. Dudley's rather comical insistence on adhering to a schedule, Eleanor and Theo painting their toe nails, dancing in the conservatory, and delicious meals in the dining room. But these moments only help prevent us from dying from fright.

Julie Harris as Eleanor Vance

I think Julie Harris does a good job of playing Eleanor as a rather mixed-up psychological mess. We are not really certain how much of what is going on is in her mind or not. Obviously it is not ALL in her mind, since we know in the movie and the book that the others see and hear things that are disturbing and frightening. Eleanor, the young woman who felt that she doesn't belong anywhere, begins to feel at home in Hill House not long after her initial repulsion of the invitation on the wall of "Help Eleanor come home". Something snaps inside her when she sees her own name on the wall of Hill House, and she (and we) begin to wonder, what does this mean? I certainly never thought Eleanor would willingly go back to her sister's home, the only home she had, once she had found the strength to leave at last. But where would she go after her time at Hill House? Maybe Hill House itself has found the answer.

There is another movie adaptation based on this book. The Haunting with Liam Neeson, Lili Taylor, Catherine Zeta-Jones, and Owen Wilson came out in 1999. Despite the excellent cast, I feel that the screenwriters were too free with their adaptation, including too many story changes. I hate cheap tricks in scary movies, and this one is full of them. Shirley Jackson and her phenomenal book deserved better.

I first read this story in high school and was suitably scared silly. I think I read this story and see the Julie Harris version of the movie at least once a year. I have inflicted it on others--family, friends, and library patrons. It is often quoted, especially the reference to "whatever walked there, walked alone." It is a high bar to clear when evaluating or writing other haunted house stories. Nobody who likes horror stories should miss this book, and nobody who likes horror movies should miss Julie Harris's movie performance.

Velcome!

I did not get up this morning thinking, I am going to start a blog today. It happened later in the day, when I thought to myself, I would like to have the experience of blogging about something, but what could I talk about that hasn't already been said? This led a conversation with myself about what do I like to talk and think about:

• Working in a public library
• Reading books
• Reading books about ghosts
• Reading books about disasters and end-of-the-world scenarios
• Watching movies about above
• Talking to my teenage children about the above

So what can I do with those interests? I can write my blog on the horror and disaster books that I read and find at the library. I can write about the ghost stories and movies and television shows that catch my attention. Will this be something that interests anybody but me? I don't know, but it will get me thinking about a genre which I particularly like. If it turns out that I can share my thoughts with others, that will be a bonus! Maybe my kids will participate, we will see.

Anyway, "velcome" to my blog.